They say “sunlight is the best disinfectant.” For decades, Californians have trusted their public pension system — CalPERS — to safeguard retirement savings. But what if a massive portion of those savings is being channeled into a shadowy financial machine, enriching a few powerful firms like Apollo, and potentially fueling dark-money political influence?

With roughly $50 billion flowing through private-equity and alternative-asset funds managed by a handful of giant firms, including Apollo, CalPERS is among the largest financiers of big private capital in America. Yet nearly none of that money is traceable once it enters no-bid contracts, asset-management fees, carried interest, and opaque side deals. The funds disappear into the pockets of firms like Apollo — firms with deep links to political influence, former executives in roles of power, and a history shadowed by scandal.

As one compelling recent exposé argues, state pension money may have indirectly funded operations tied to Jeffrey Epstein via Apollo — raising hard questions about oversight, ethics, and democracy.

That lack of transparency isn’t a bug — it’s a feature. And it directly threatens the integrity of public pensions, the independence of politics, and the trust Californians place in both.   With Montana setting new laws that limit the effects of Dark Money post Citizens United,  it is California’s turn.

---

🛑 Why a Ballot Initiative Is Needed — And Why Apollo Matters

1. Public pensions shouldn’t bankroll private-equity firms with checkered histories

CalPERS — and through it, public employees and taxpayers — effectively underwrites the profits of firms like Apollo. Once that money enters the private-equity ecosystem, the trail vanishes. Apollo fees, carried interest, and “co-investments” are seldom subject to public disclosure.

That matters when such firms have histories of controversy. Apollo’s senior executives and business dealings have intersected with scandals, including associations with high-profile figures, hedge-fund influence, and a web of global capital flows. If funds derived from pensions are then used for political contributions, media acquisitions, or lobbying — none of it needs to be public or traceable.

Apollo investments were directly connected to the CALPERS Executive Director going to prison and a CALPERS Trustee committing suicide before going to prison.  This is on top of the multiple connections between Jeffrey Epstein and Apollo founder Leon Black.  https://commonsense401kproject.com/2025/07/17/were-state-pensions-indirectly-funding-jeffrey-epstein-via-apollo/

2. The “black box” of private equity + political money = systemic risk

Because private-equity firms like Apollo often operate behind limited-partner confidentiality, shell-company structures, and complex fee/carry arrangements, it becomes virtually impossible to trace how pension-derived income is redirected into political power. That’s not transparency — it’s a built-in mechanism for influence laundering: public pension money → private equity fees → dark-money spending.

A constitutional or statutory-level reform is needed to:

• Force full disclosure of all private-market managers receiving pension-derived money (GP name, fund name, amount paid, fees, carry).
• Require PJCE (political-justice contribution/expenditure) reporting by any firm or entity receiving significant pension money — within 30 days, not after months or years.
• Prohibit or strictly cap contributions/independent expenditures from entities yet to disclose their pension-income provenance.

3. This reform can unite workers, retirees, taxpayers, and voters

CalPERS’ beneficiaries — public-sector workers, retirees, school-employees — are already squeezed by underfunded pensions, rising contributions, and opaque management fees. A transparency initiative with Apollo as a central example speaks to a broad coalition:

• Public-sector employees demanding their pensions be protected, not gambled;
• Taxpayers wary of hidden financial flows underwriting political campaigns;
• Advocates for campaign-finance reform opposed to dark-money dominance;
• Retirees who deserve clarity on how their retirement savings are invested and what returns (or risks) follow.

4. It aligns with recent calls for broader campaign-finance and pension reform

Many Californians already support tighter campaign-finance rules. A “Pension-to-Politics Transparency” initiative — especially with vivid examples like Apollo — gives voters a concrete, actionable reform that connects pensions, private equity, and democratic integrity.

---

👇 What the Initiative Should Demand — Starting With Apollo-Level Disclosure

• Full public disclosure of all private-equity / alternative-asset managers receiving pension-derived funds — including GP name, fund name(s), vintage(s), committed capital, fees paid, carried interest structure, co-investments, side letters, and any other revenue streams tied to pension money.
• Real-time political-contribution reporting by any firm or entity that receives more than a threshold (e.g., $5M/year) from public pension funds — including direct contributions and independent expenditures for or against candidates or ballot measures.
• Bans or strict limits on political contributions by firms still holding large amounts of public-pension-derived capital — to prevent conflicts of interest and the appearance of quid pro quo.
• Clawback provisions and oversight — beneficiaries (or a public-interest watchdog) can challenge and recover fees if performance is poor, governance standards are violated, or political-spending disclosure is incomplete or false.
• Independent audits and transparency enforcement — including publicly accessible data sets, regular audits of private-equity allocations, returns, and political-spending links.

---

🎯 Why This Could Be a Winning Campaign Theme for a Reform-Oriented California Governor

• Anchoring a campaign on corporate accountability, pension integrity, and anti-dark-money promises both moral clarity and political appeal.
• With Apollo — and other PE giants — so widely disliked by ordinary voters (especially given recent scandals), a reform-minded candidate can position themselves as a champion of the public, not just big finance.
• I think Private Equity has already made a preemptive strike against one progressive candidate Katie Porter https://commonsense401kproject.com/2025/11/08/why-private-equity-sees-katie-porter-as-a-strategic-threat-as-california-governor/  
• Besides Porter other progressive candidates could support this issue as well as populist libertarian type candidates.
• For public-sector, retirees, and working Californians — the idea that their retirement savings shouldn’t be financing shadowy political campaigns is likely to resonate strongly.
• The issue transcends traditional left–right divides: workers, taxpayers, good-government reformers, and even fiscally conservative voters have reason to support transparency as it appears they are doing in Montana
• .

---

✊ Final Thought: Pension Money — Not Political Money

Pension funds were meant to guarantee retirement security and financial stability. Instead, increasingly they have become sources of opaque wealth for private-equity firms — firms like Apollo, which then channel profits into political influence lines no one votes for.

It’s time for California voters to demand accountability. It’s time for a ballot initiative to expose the private-equity black box. And it’s time for a Governor who stands for pensions, transparency, and democracy — not secret money and hidden power.

If you believe in public integrity, fairness for retirees, and a democracy free from shadowy financial influence — share this post, support the initiative, and help build momentum for real reform.

California Needs a “Pension-to-Politics Transparency” Initiative — Montana Model and Apollo Shows Why

They say “sunlight is the best disinfectant.” For decades, Californians have trusted their public pension system — CalPERS — to safeguard retirement savings. But what if a massive portion of those savings is being channeled into a shadowy financial machine, enriching a few powerful firms like Apollo, and potentially fueling dark-money political influence?

With roughly $50 billion flowing through private-equity and alternative-asset funds managed by a handful of giant firms, including Apollo, CalPERS is among the largest financiers of big private capital in America. Yet nearly none of that money is traceable once it enters no-bid contracts, asset-management fees, carried interest, and opaque side deals. The funds disappear into the pockets of firms like Apollo — firms with deep links to political influence, former executives in roles of power, and a history shadowed by scandal.

As one compelling recent exposé argues, state pension money may have indirectly funded operations tied to Jeffrey Epstein via Apollo — raising hard questions about oversight, ethics, and democracy.

That lack of transparency isn’t a bug — it’s a feature. And it directly threatens the integrity of public pensions, the independence of politics, and the trust Californians place in both.   With Montana setting new laws that limit the effects of Dark Money post Citizens United,  it is California’s turn.

---

🛑 Why a Ballot Initiative Is Needed — And Why Apollo Matters

1. Public pensions shouldn’t bankroll private-equity firms with checkered histories

CalPERS — and through it, public employees and taxpayers — effectively underwrites the profits of firms like Apollo. Once that money enters the private-equity ecosystem, the trail vanishes. Apollo fees, carried interest, and “co-investments” are seldom subject to public disclosure.

That matters when such firms have histories of controversy. Apollo’s senior executives and business dealings have intersected with scandals, including associations with high-profile figures, hedge-fund influence, and a web of global capital flows. If funds derived from pensions are then used for political contributions, media acquisitions, or lobbying — none of it needs to be public or traceable.

Apollo investments were directly connected to the CALPERS Executive Director going to prison and a CALPERS Trustee committing suicide before going to prison.  This is on top of the multiple connections between Jeffrey Epstein and Apollo founder Leon Black.  https://commonsense401kproject.com/2025/07/17/were-state-pensions-indirectly-funding-jeffrey-epstein-via-apollo/

2. The “black box” of private equity + political money = systemic risk

Because private-equity firms like Apollo often operate behind limited-partner confidentiality, shell-company structures, and complex fee/carry arrangements, it becomes virtually impossible to trace how pension-derived income is redirected into political power. That’s not transparency — it’s a built-in mechanism for influence laundering: public pension money → private equity fees → dark-money spending.

A constitutional or statutory-level reform is needed to:

• Force full disclosure of all private-market managers receiving pension-derived money (GP name, fund name, amount paid, fees, carry).
• Require PJCE (political-justice contribution/expenditure) reporting by any firm or entity receiving significant pension money — within 30 days, not after months or years.
• Prohibit or strictly cap contributions/independent expenditures from entities yet to disclose their pension-income provenance.

3. This reform can unite workers, retirees, taxpayers, and voters

CalPERS’ beneficiaries — public-sector workers, retirees, school-employees — are already squeezed by underfunded pensions, rising contributions, and opaque management fees. A transparency initiative with Apollo as a central example speaks to a broad coalition:

• Public-sector employees demanding their pensions be protected, not gambled;
• Taxpayers wary of hidden financial flows underwriting political campaigns;
• Advocates for campaign-finance reform opposed to dark-money dominance;
• Retirees who deserve clarity on how their retirement savings are invested and what returns (or risks) follow.

4. It aligns with recent calls for broader campaign-finance and pension reform

Many Californians already support tighter campaign-finance rules. A “Pension-to-Politics Transparency” initiative — especially with vivid examples like Apollo — gives voters a concrete, actionable reform that connects pensions, private equity, and democratic integrity.

---

👇 What the Initiative Should Demand — Starting With Apollo-Level Disclosure

• Full public disclosure of all private-equity / alternative-asset managers receiving pension-derived funds — including GP name, fund name(s), vintage(s), committed capital, fees paid, carried interest structure, co-investments, side letters, and any other revenue streams tied to pension money.
• Real-time political-contribution reporting by any firm or entity that receives more than a threshold (e.g., $5M/year) from public pension funds — including direct contributions and independent expenditures for or against candidates or ballot measures.
• Bans or strict limits on political contributions by firms still holding large amounts of public-pension-derived capital — to prevent conflicts of interest and the appearance of quid pro quo.
• Clawback provisions and oversight — beneficiaries (or a public-interest watchdog) can challenge and recover fees if performance is poor, governance standards are violated, or political-spending disclosure is incomplete or false.
• Independent audits and transparency enforcement — including publicly accessible data sets, regular audits of private-equity allocations, returns, and political-spending links.

---

🎯 Why This Could Be a Winning Campaign Theme for a Reform-Oriented California Governor

• Anchoring a campaign on corporate accountability, pension integrity, and anti-dark-money promises both moral clarity and political appeal.
• With Apollo — and other PE giants — so widely disliked by ordinary voters (especially given recent scandals), a reform-minded candidate can position themselves as a champion of the public, not just big finance.
• I think Private Equity has already made a preemptive strike against one progressive candidate, Katie Porter https://commonsense401kproject.com/2025/11/08/why-private-equity-sees-katie-porter-as-a-strategic-threat-as-california-governor/  
• Besides Porter, other progressive candidates could support this issue as well as populist libertarian type candidates.
• For public-sector, retirees, and working Californians — the idea that their retirement savings shouldn’t be financing shadowy political campaigns is likely to resonate strongly.
• The issue transcends traditional left–right divides: workers, taxpayers, good-government reformers, and even fiscally conservative voters have reason to support transparency as it appears they are doing in Montana
• .

---

✊ Final Thought: Pension Money — Not Political Money

Pension funds were meant to guarantee retirement security and financial stability. Instead, increasingly they have become sources of opaque wealth for private-equity firms — firms like Apollo, which then channel profits into political influence lines no one votes for.

It’s time for California voters to demand accountability. It’s time for a ballot initiative to expose the private-equity black box. And it’s time for a Governor who stands for pensions, transparency, and democracy — not secret money and hidden power.

If you believe in public integrity, fairness for retirees, and a democracy free from shadowy financial influence — share this post, support the initiative, and help build momentum for real reform.